Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Response of The Cost of Saving a Jumper Essay Example

Response of The Cost of Saving a Jumper Essay Example Response of The Cost of Saving a Jumper Essay Response of The Cost of Saving a Jumper Essay Chute www The Cost of Saving a Jumper In The Cost of Saving a Jumper by Joan Ryan, Ryan forthrightly exposes a current social awareness that people are simply not willing to take responsibilities while they subjectively focus on their self-interests. When looking at the article logically, Ryans argument is convenience due to her detailed evidence. Thus I agree with Ryan that many people are gradually inclined to overweight their personal cost and their foolishness to overlook others rights and needsthat have become a pervasive and calumnious behavior nowadays. There is always an inevitable contradiction between the value of lives and the cost of saving it, and indeed many Americans prefer to being more concerned about the latter, mostly because they get used to compare other people as threats, not as partners. In the article, Ryan utilizes the controversial incident about the suicide attempt in Bay Bridge that resulted in a 13 1/2 hour traffic Jam. Confronting the severe traffic congestion and financial losses, some people firmly hold their opinion hat saving a persons life is the most moral obligation for everyone. You do whatever it takes for however long it takes to prevent the suicide(par 3). Nevertheless, there are more people still ceaselessly complained that relevant authority must remove the Jumper as soon as possible principally for the sake of their convenience. The resistant Jumper might be hurt or even fail to his death in the process, but since he put himself in such a dangerous position, he is ultimately responsible for the r esult(par 4). Furthermore, in order to insist the seriousness of he cost, they further to recognize themselves as hostages and the Jumper who actually felt desperate to death as a narcissist who wants to be the center of attention(par 4). Yet it appeared that rather than trying to alleviate the intense controversy, the people seemed committing to fanning it. Unarguably, getting stuck in freeway, many people might have a knee-Jerk revulsion to the inconvenienceborne of fear of missing their appointments, Job interviews or a broader anxiety about the huge economic losses. Instead of overreaching personal cost, however, we as people ought to understand that nothing is worthier than saving a fragile life. The value of lives is equal and inestimable. Schedules and meetings can be postponed or reordered, money we can earn back sooner or later, but we are absolutely unable to retrieve our life once it was gone. Additionally, before building the bridge there was a bridge barrier proposal but it lastly failed by an overwhelming majority. The barrier was opposed because people dont want to pay for it and didnt want their views from their bridge obstructed(par 15). In retrospect, if we agreed with building airier by paying a little more taxes, the Jumper would not attempt to committed suicide in the bridge; besides, we definitely would not have a slightly possibilities to suffer such considerable loss as a result. Its a matter of responsibility. Why should we demand the Jumper ought to be responsible for his decision while we try to duck our responsibility? Weve become so accustomed to and its hardly to notice anymore. Devote to one suicide attempt. It is how do we diminish the chances that a Jumper can climb onto the bridge and stop traffic in the future. Par 14). In the wake of social responsibility, this suicide attempt case indeed became evident to us that a serious mistake has been done. Living in the world where replete with competition and pressure, we will increasingly face decisions about when to be responsible for our behavior; moreover, it is crucial that we need to comprehend more clearly about causes and overall impact?not only for extraordinary actions like Bay Area suicide issue but also for ordinary ones, like maintaining public security, voting sensibly and lending a hand to each other spontaneously.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.